April 9, 2009 decision denying the County’s attempt to appeal the decision immediately and get the trial delayed. Among other things, the decision stated that “the defendant has also repeatedly...view
Westchester Case
Westchester Case
The Court’s April 22nd decision granting the Center’s motion to find that Westchester’s certifications (already found to be false) were “material” as a matter of law to its receipt...view
Westchester Case
The July, 2007 federal court decision denying the County’s motion to dismiss. The citation is 495 F.Supp.2d 375 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).
view
Westchester Case
Westchester tried to argue that the federal government was not hurt by the County’s fraud because the government got the “benefit” of the County performing the non-AFFH requirements of its...view
Westchester Case
The full text of the February 24, 2009 decision.
view
Westchester Case
Read the August 10, 2009 release.
view
Westchester Case
A letter summarizing the Monitor’s initial findings regarding the deficiencies of Westchester’s submission. The letter directs Westchester to review ADC’s report, putting the...view
Westchester Case
ADC’s February 2010 analysis of Westchester’s submission to the Monitor, subtitled “A Preliminary Report on Westchester’s Attempt to Ignore and Evade the Requirements of the...view
Westchester Case
Hard on the heels of ADC’s Prescription for Failure report, the federal Monitor appointed to oversee compliance with the Settlement Order has rejected what Westchester had described as an “...view