Home
- Faulty premises about nature of problem yield faulty solutions. An effective rule can't assume cooperative jurisdictions. A requirement for practical actions steps still nowhere to be found.
- Failure to analyze different minority groups separately and focus on "clustering" instead of "segregation" among the problems identified. Monitor refuses to believe that HUD letter actually represents genuine or considered view of agency or U.S. Attorney; demands further "signal" from Government.
- A legal analysis true to established law would really rock the boat, so the Monitor made up his own, more limited, rule.
- Privilege? Check. Secrecy? Check. Unaccountability? Check. Breeding grounds for discrimination? You bet. Do you have a co-op horror story to tell?
- More civil rights groups have concluded that enforcement of the landmark housing desegregation court order entered against Westchester County five years ago has been entirely inadequate and are demanding that the Justice Department "alter course and vindicate the integrity of the consent decree."
- At court conference on Westchester case, U.S. attorney tries to excuse its failure to hold Westchester to account by suggesting that a defendant can shield itself from having to perform court-ordered tasks by denying the existence of facts staring the defendant in the face.
- Civil rights advocates and other activists are among many who do. So what's our problem? To start, the phrase often acts to sanitize segregation. Plus the phrase is often used to suggest -- consciously or unconsciously -- that you can use race or ethnicity as a proxy to be able to judge the opinions, interests, or behavior of all members of a group or neighborhood. And that's just the beginning.
