Westchester Case

Westchester Case
Sept. 29, 2014 — Back in June, despite obvious and fundamental flaws in the Monitor’s proposed methodology for conducting a disparate impact analysis, HUD signed off on that methodology (...view
Westchester Case
Sept. 9, 2014 — Jim Johnson, the Monitor in the Westchester case, released a preliminary report late yesterday purporting to address the disparate impact of the zoning practices of Westchester...view
Westchester Case
July 9, 2014 — The Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and the Poverty and Race Research Action Council have recently sent a letter to Jim Johnson, the Monitor in the...view
Westchester Case
June 27, 2014 — Yesterday evening, Jim Johnson, the Monitor in the Westchester case, issued his biennial report (six months after it was due). The report was a masterpiece of misdirection. The most...view
Westchester Case
The letter from NFHA - the nation’s leading fair housing organization - that the Monitor chose to ignore. view
Westchester Case
The complaint, originally filed under seal in April, 2006. view
Westchester Case
Read some of the positions that the County took during the litigation. view
Westchester Case
The August 2007 federal court decision denying Westchester’s motion to certify for interlocutory appeal the denial of its motion to dismiss. The citation is 2007 WL 2402997 (S.D.N.Y., August...view
Westchester Case
April 9, 2009 decision denying the County’s attempt to appeal the decision immediately and get the trial delayed. Among other things, the decision stated that “the defendant has also repeatedly...view
Westchester Case
The Court’s April 22nd decision granting the Center’s motion to find that Westchester’s certifications (already found to be false) were “material” as a matter of law to its receipt...view

Pages